4. The Garden Visited page 2
Response
vs Reply
The design of the garden is deliberately constrained
so that it can only ever act as a `receiver' for these messages (rather
like a telephone answering machine, which allows you to hear a message
but not - directly - reply to it without using a phone). Within the bounds
of the garden, there is no possibility of either speaking directly to
the creator of a message, nor of creating another Living Book as a `reply'.
This asynchronism - this one-way nature of delivering
messages - is part of the design of the Living Garden. This scheme does
not exist to replace human experience and contact. The Living Garden aims
to ensure that social `channels' of communication remain at the very centre
of human experience, affording them an importance through ritual and place
- ritual as the process of creating a Living Book, handing over a Key,
the visit to a garden; place - not a `sacred' grove, but a landscape put
aside to serve the needs of individuals, rather than the mass demands
of amorphous `people', `populations' or `markets'.
Signals & messages
So the Living Garden simply provides a mechanism to deliver
messages which can establish a relationship between individuals - it is
the contents of any message which determine what happens next. A message
may be the catalyst for two people to make contact and meet outside of
the garden at some future point; alternatively, it might provide a means
and a place in which individuals can convey experiences and events which
are never touched upon again outside of the garden (a `secret garden'?);
over the years, a Key may even be passed down through generations of a
family to provide
the means to unlock a voice from the past.
Some visitors may only choose to visit a garden once.
Others may visit the garden once in possession of a Key, but return at
later points in their life without it, simply to recall the place and
time that they once heard a message. Someone else may choose to journey
to many of the other gardens in which messages can be replayed. Over time,
their recollections of each garden - the colours, the time of year, the
sense of place, would fold into and combine with their memory and experience
of listening to a message. For one person, these successive `readings'
might make the contents, the meaning, of a message grow and flower, whilst
for another it would provide the opportunity to let a memory fade and
die away.
|